Green Public Procurement in Slovakia: Ready to Develop Innovative Effects?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61801/Arsaequi.2025.115Keywords:
green public procurement, green transition, sustainability, Slovakia, climate changeAbstract
Societal issues are challenging governments all around the world to seek innovative approaches and practices that would incorporate critical socioeconomic goals into international documents. An opportunity for introducing new approaches is public procurement, especially green public procurement (GPP). GPP is part of a green transition process towards a new development model that ensures environmentally sustainable and fairer societies. It gives opportunities to select the bids not only based on the lowest price but prioritize bids that respect the environment. In this paper, we focus on national-level factors and process factors in developing green public procurement capabilities in Slovakia as one of the EU member states. This paper analyses the current state of green public procurement capabilities (legislation, strategic documents) and performance (analysis of green bids and contracts in the years 2023-2024). The practical implications of our research lie in the importance for post-transition, transition and developing countries, where public procurement is still mainly about 'buy as cheap as possible', and its broader context is not considered to the extent necessary. Specific research on the functioning of green public procurement as a source of environmental innovation must also reflect on this fundamental dimension.
References
AHSAN K and RAHMAN S, ‘Green Public Procurement Implementation Challenges in Australian Public Healthcare Sector’ (2017) 152 Journal of Cleaner Production 181-197
ALKADRY MG, TRAMMELL E and DIMAND AM, ‘The Power of Public Procurement: Social Equity and Sustainability as Externalities and as Deliberate Policy Tools’ (2019) 12(3) International Journal of Procurement Management 336-362
BOLTON P, ‘Government Procurement as a Policy Tool in South Africa’ (2006) 6(3) Journal of Public Procurement 193-217
BRAMMER S and WALKER H, ‘Sustainable Procurement in the Public Sector: An International Comparative Study’ (2011) 31(4) International Journal of Operations & Production Management 452-476
CHENG W, APPOLLONI A, D’AMATO A and ZHU Q, ‘Green Public Procurement, Missing Concepts and Future Trends – A Critical Review’ (2018) 176 Journal of Cleaner Production 770-784
CHANG HS and KRISTIANSEN P, ‘Selling Australia as “Clean and Green”’ (2006) 50(1) Australian Journal of Agricul-tural and Resource Economics 103-113
DIMAND AM, DARNALL N and BEHRAVESH S, ‘Leveraging Procurement for a Sustainable Future’ (2023) 28(3) Interna-tional Review of Public Administration 402-409
EVANS L, NUTTALL C, MOUAT A and EWING D, Assessment and Comparison of National Green and Sustainable Public Procurement Criteria and Underlying Schemes: Final Report (2010) http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/studies_en.htm
GRANDIA JJ and KRUYEN PP, ‘Assessing the Implementation of Sustainable Public Procurement Using Quantitative Text-Analysis Tools: A Large-Scale Analysis of Belgian Public Procurement Notices’ (2020) 26(4) Journal of Pur-chasing and Supply Management 100627
HALONEN KM, ‘Is Public Procurement Fit for Reaching Sustainability Goals? A Law and Economics Approach to Green Public Procurement’ (2021) 28(4) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 535-555
HASANBEIGI A, BECQUE R and SPRINGER C, Curbing Carbon from Consumption: The Role of Green Public Procurement (Global Efficiency Intelligence 2019)
HO LW, DICKINSON NM and CHAN GY, ‘Green Procurement in the Asian Public Sector and the Hong Kong Private Sector’ (2010) 34(1) Natural Resources Forum 24-38
KOU M, ZHANG L, WANG H, WANG Y and SHAN Z, ‘The Heterogeneous Impact of Green Public Procurement on Cor-porate Green Innovation’ (2024) 203 Resources, Conservation and Recycling 107441
KRIEGER B and ZIPPERER V, ‘Does Green Public Procurement Trigger Environmental Innovations?’ (2022) 51(6) Research Policy 104516
LEMBER V, KATTEL R and KALVET T, ‘Quo Vadis Public Procurement of Innovation?’ (2015) 28(3) Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 403-421
MALATINEC T, ‘Legislative Framework of Green Public Procurement and Europeanisation of the Slovak Practice’ (2017) 7 Tribuna Juridică 95-107
MALATINEC T, ‘Local Barriers in the Efficient Use of Green Public Procurement – Case of Slovakia’ (2021) 11(3) Tribuna Juridică 524-534
MEULEMAN L, VALENTINI F, NIESTROY I and CAIGER-SMITH I, Management of Policy Coherence for Sustainable Devel-opment – Towards Measuring Progress (European Commission, Directorate-General for Structural Reform Sup-port, Publications Office of the European Union 2022) https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2887/544379 accessed 16 December 2025.
MICHELSEN O and DE BOER L, ‘Green Procurement in Norway: A Survey of Practices at the Municipal and County Level’ (2009) 91(1) Journal of Environmental Management 160-167
PARIKKA-ALHOLA K, ‘Promoting Environmentally Sound Furniture by Green Public Procurement’ (2008) 68(1–2) Ecological Economics 472-485
RAINVILLE A, ‘Standards in Green Public Procurement – A Framework to Enhance Innovation’ (2017) 167 Journal of Cleaner Production 1029-1037
RODIONOVA Y, NEMEC J, TKACHENKO A and YAKOVLEV A, ‘Informal Practices and Efficiency in Public Procurement’ (2022) Public Money & Management 1-9
ROSELL J, ‘Did Governments Neglect the Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic? An Empirical Analysis of Green Public Procurement’ (2023) 80 Economic Analysis and Policy 835-849
SÖNNICHSEN SD and CLEMENT J, ‘Review of Green and Sustainable Public Procurement: Towards Circular Public Procurement’ (2020) 245 Journal of Cleaner Production 118901
SWANSON M, WEISSMAN A, DAVIS G, SOCOLOF ML and DAVIS K, ‘Developing Priorities for Greener State Government Purchasing: A California Case Study’ (2005) 13(7) Journal of Cleaner Production 669-677
TESTA F, ANNUNZIATA E, IRALDO F and FREY M, ‘Drawbacks and Opportunities of Green Public Procurement: An Effective Tool for Sustainable Production’ (2016) 112 Journal of Cleaner Production 1893-1900
TESTA F, GRAPPIO P, GUSMEROTTI NM, IRALDO F and FREY M, ‘Examining Green Public Procurement Using Content Analysis: Existing Difficulties for Procurers and Useful Recommendations’ (2016) 18(1) Environment, Development and Sustainability 197-219
VAN DER ZWAN J, A Qualitative Study on the Status and Prospects of Green Public Procurement in Slovakia (AID 2018)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 © The Author(s).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
